Back to Insights

High Achievers, Founders, and the Cost of an Average Ecosystem

In Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030 has led to the establishment of a wide range of agencies and programmes designed to support founders. This has meaningfully expanded opportunity and access. As the ecosystem matures, there is growing scope to strengthen coordination, data-sharing, and continuity across institutions, so founders can spend less time navigating processes and more time building. Greater alignment around clarity, progression, and measured impact would help ensure that high-performing founders are supported in ways that amplify their contribution to the Kingdom. This perspective sits at the centre of how Papi & Laado approaches impact - purposefully, collaboratively, and in service of Kingdoms outcomes.

High Achievers, Founders, and the Cost of an Average Ecosystem

In organisational settings, neglect of high performers often appears as stalled development rather than insufficient reward. A similar pattern emerges within venture ecosystems. Founders who reach the stage of seeking funding, expertise, or structured support have typically already demonstrated sustained effort, learning capacity, and resilience. These individuals often exhibit the same growth-driven characteristics observed in high-performing employees.

Ecosystem structures - incubators, accelerators, venture capital funds, and public enablers - are designed to provide clarity, guidance, and progression. However, public data on outcomes suggests that many programmes default to standardised pathways and time-bound cohorts. Where support becomes procedural rather than intentional, high-potential founders may experience a form of developmental neglect. Accelerator feedback notes that some founders pass through programmes without receiving depth of challenge or tailored progression.

High-performing founders tend to amplify the productivity of those around them. Their energy, pace, and standards often shape team behaviour and partner engagement. When they operate in environments lacking transparency, committed follow-through, or relevant expertise, this energy dissipates. Anecdotal reports indicate that misalignment between founder intent and ecosystem capability can lead to disengagement, delayed execution, or premature exit from the system.

From a system design perspective, the issue mirrors corporate performance management failures. Support mechanisms that function as tick-box exercises may achieve average outputs, but they under-serve individuals capable of disproportionate impact. Research on entrepreneurial learning suggests that founders at advanced stages benefit most from context-specific coaching, peer challenge, and access to experienced operators rather than generic curriculum delivery.

Within a National Sense of Responsibility frame, this becomes an ecosystem obligation rather than a programme flaw. Retaining and developing naturally high-performing founders requires clarity of intent, transparent expectations, committed support, and credible expertise. High performers bring momentum that must be met with equal seriousness and readiness for next steps. When systems are prepared to match that energy, productivity increases not only for the individual but for the wider venture environment.

Takeaways

  • Founders reaching formal support stages often exhibit high-performer characteristics that require intentional development.
  • Standardised ecosystem programmes risk neglecting individuals capable of disproportionate impact.
  • From an NSR perspective, matching founder energy with clarity, commitment, and real expertise is a structural responsibility.